Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Strip Ä¡ÀºÀÚ°¡À̽ļúÈÄ À̽ÄÆíÀÇ ¼öÃà·ü¿¡ °üÇÑ ÀÓ»óÀû ¿¬±¸

The Clinical Study on Snnntcage Rate of Graft following Strip Gingival Autografts

´ëÇÑÄ¡ÁÖ°úÇÐȸÁö 1997³â 27±Ç 3È£ p.549 ~ 560
Á¤Çؼö, ÀÓ¼ººó, °­¿ëÁÖ,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
Á¤Çؼö (  ) - ´Ü±¹´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡ÁÖ°úÇб³½Ç
ÀÓ¼ººó (  ) - ´Ü±¹´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡ÁÖ°úÇб³½Ç
°­¿ëÁÖ (  ) - ´Ü±¹´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡ÁÖ°úÇб³½Ç

Abstract


The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical changes in graft size after treatment with strip gingival autograft in human. 57 premolar teeth in 27 patients having the following rnucogingival problems were selected.
The width of extension, attached gingiva including free marginal gingiva, width of transplant and clinical sulcus depth were measured at the initial examination, 2, 12 and 24 weeks following the strip gingival autograft and free gingival autograft.
The change of width of extension, attached gingiva including free marginal gingiva, width of transplant and clinical sulcus depth according to healing process in both graft procedures was statistically analyzed by repeated measure ANOVA test and independent t-test 11. iag SPSS program.
The results were as follows
1. The change of keratinized gingiva in both graft procedures was increased significantly at 24 weeks post-op.
2. The clinical sulcus depth exhibited no marked changes throughout the entire investigation in both graft procedures.
3. No dimensional variation was seen in graft size in both graft procedures.
4. Shrinkage did not differ significantly in both graft procedures. From the day of grafting to
24 weeks after surgery the percentages of shrinkage were : strip gingival autograft 28% and
free gingival autograft 29%.

Å°¿öµå

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI